<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Startups on Félix Tréguer</title>
    <link>https://www.felixtreguer.fr/en/tags/startups/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Startups on Félix Tréguer</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.felixtreguer.fr/en/tags/startups/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Startup Privilege</title>
      <link>https://www.felixtreguer.fr/en/2025/01/15/the-startup-privilege/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.felixtreguer.fr/en/2025/01/15/the-startup-privilege/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have just published an &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2025/02/TREGUER/68037&#34;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; (in French, Spanish and Portuguese) in &lt;em&gt;Le Monde diplomatique&lt;/em&gt; analyzing how technological innovation is used to justify increasing exemptions from fundamental rights, particularly in the field of digital surveillance.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;summary&#34;&gt;Summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This article examines how the discourse of innovation and the rhetoric of disruption are used to justify regulatory exemptions (aka &amp;ldquo;regulatory sandboxes&amp;rdquo;) and legal experiments that primarily benefit technology companies.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The analysis shows how this privilege of experimentation is part of a deliberate strategy of fait accompli: by rapidly deploying their services and building up a user base (including public users) before any real public debate, these companies and public authorities seek to impose these technologies in order to then legalize controversial practices &lt;em&gt;a posteriori&lt;/em&gt;. This asymmetry between entrepreneurial timing and legal timing profoundly transforms the relationship between the market and the law, echoing some of the legal theories advocated by Carl Schmitt.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
